Alabama Legal Ethics

1.3 Rule 1.3 Diligence

1.3:100 Comparative Analysis of Alabama Rule

Primary Alabama References: AL Rule 1.3
Background References: ABA Model Rule 1.3, Other Jurisdictions
Commentary:
Alabama Commentary:

1.3:101 Model Rule Comparison

ARPC 1.3 differs significantly from MRPC Rule 1.3 in that the Alabama rule provides a "willful neglect" standard as opposed to the "reasonable" standard promulgated by the MRPC. Willful neglect does not require an evil motive or bad purpose, yet it means more than simple neglect, mere inadvertence or a technical breach. Nelson v. State, 182 Ala. 449 (1913); State v. Martin, 180 Ala. 458 (1913). Misrepresentation of the status of a matter can constitute willful neglect. Hunt v. Ala. State Bar, 381 So.2d 52, 54 (Ala. 1980). Failure to prepare or file pleadings after agreement to do so can constitute willful neglect. Haynes v. Ala. State Bar, 447 So.2d 675, 677 (Ala. 1984).

1.3:102 Model Code Comparison

Inapplicable

1.3:200 Diligence and "Zeal"

Primary Alabama References: AL Rule 1.3
Background References: ABA Model Rule 1.3, Other Jurisdictions
Commentary: ABA/BNA § 31:401, ALI-LGL § 16, Wolfram § 10.3
Alabama Commentary:

Lack of diligence frequently includes failure to communicate, procrastination, poor office management, no case tracking system, no conflicts checking system, no follow up, and an overly heavy workload.

1.3:300 Promptness

Primary Alabama References: AL Rule 1.3
Background References: ABA Model Rule 1.3, Other Jurisdictions
Commentary: ABA/BNA § 31:401, ALI-LGL § 16, Wolfram § 10.3
Alabama Commentary:

See Section 1.3:200.